|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 18, 2015 7:20:07 GMT -6
Hilliary quote from Philadelphia 2008: I will also work to reinstate the assault weapons ban. We had it during the 1990s. It really was an aid to our police officers, who are now once again, because it has lapsed--the Republicans will not reinstate it--are being outgunned on our streets by these military-style weapons.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 18, 2015 7:16:12 GMT -6
Pam, Hillary voted YES to hold gun manufacture liable for gun violence! That was a plain waste of time and money in congress! like saying going to hold McDonalds liable because you get fat off eating Big Macs every day LOL.
She also has stated she will re enact the assault weapons ban. That did nothing for crime what so ever and term AR does not mean assault rifle, it means Armalite Rifle corp! They are a semi automatic rifle like any other in forms and function. The idea that magazine limits damage is bunk, as it only takes a few seconds to change out a magazine.
When Bill took away such that was a niche market at the time, now millions of people own AR style rifles would be a much harder fight today than back in the 90's. yet she still made that comment.
A 3 day waiting period is just BS, as with the NICS system most of the time they can get the information and process it over th phone. if they have questions or concerns they will tell the gun salesmen to place a hold on the gun and by federal law you can't dispose of a firearm until the date given out by the NICS representative any how. So in effect we do have a 3-7 day waiting period for certain people.
The people have answered many of those questions by stocking up and buying guns like never before in our countries history, they do not want people limiting their ability to own firearms. Shooting sports has become much larger over the course of the last decade. No denying such.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 16, 2015 20:22:30 GMT -6
No breaks down has to do with the base and how to best control break down with a preservative as well,I want a pasty lure to stay such not turn to water in the summer heat.
I had a skunky lure that lost it punch rather quickly as well, wondering if the skunk was original essence or a synthetic form? the first few weeks the skunk was very noticeable, after a few weeks easy to tell the skunk was loosing its punch.
Consistent lures are hard to find, but ones that work well and stay the same even harder anymore. When I find them I stick with them for sure.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 16, 2015 20:16:14 GMT -6
Jim that is why we can't have a dem back as president well and other reasons, but the 2nd amendment is the next BIG puzzle piece for the dems, they got AHC and now onto gun control and they see that as a real win for their side. Dangerous for sure.
If we want the gun companies and reloading companies to make millions and millions more in a short period we need the dems to keep talking gun control and elect me and we will take away gun rights. LOL.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 15, 2015 5:05:50 GMT -6
Paul Ryan LOL. Not Hilliary and no one wants speaker of the house because they would have to work with the wacko Nancy Pelosi and could be bad for any future political career. name the last president who was speaker of the house?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 14, 2015 19:56:29 GMT -6
Can work Tman, I have kept good record through the years and for me I have better summer time baits and lures and some well they fall apart when it gets hot just facts.
I had some name brand gland lure that was solid until it was in the lure box in the summer, then it turned to water, different smell for sure! Had this happen with more than a couple lures. Some are formulated to with stand the heat and stay more consistent than others.
I don't like runny lures I want a lure that can and will hold up in all conditions.
Some lures and a few baits are what you described good year round but plenty that aren't IMO.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 13, 2015 18:54:06 GMT -6
RDFX sorry but many liberals are just that (brain dead) if she runs they will vote for her as they would soon see her versus anyone else. LOL.
To think this woman would have any ability to run our country well is just false. She would. It be someone to take our country forward and our foreign relations and military would be at a grave disservice.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 13, 2015 18:50:49 GMT -6
Depends on what reaction the bait or lure gives and what time of year.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 8, 2015 5:24:31 GMT -6
Oh well I will have the boy setting daggers and cleaning them up.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 8, 2015 5:23:15 GMT -6
Look at this mo beauty LOL. Flat as an ironing board yet. I have just a few coons on my place this year More mo top lots LOL
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 2, 2015 17:36:13 GMT -6
Cool photos man those southern coyotes are butt ugly,no wonder they need to keep them alive LOL. Dead they would look twice as bad LOL.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 25, 2015 19:04:00 GMT -6
They are trying a hybrid system, first they want employers to cover the cost then they will take anyone who doesn't have coverage based on income. So someone working less than 28 hrs will qualify got AHC at a reduced rate based on income yet it still cost the govt the same amount to cover someone at 40 without versus someone 27 hrs without.
To me seems silly really...........
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 25, 2015 18:57:17 GMT -6
What facts Tman?
Bryce they do not need to comply if they keep hours below 28 hrs per week! Again as I stated counter productive to the work force.
Again if you have 100 employees at 2,000 per employee that is 200,000 annually, so they just switch to limiting hours and having a few more people work.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 25, 2015 5:24:39 GMT -6
Bryce you stated it above, over time this will not be about companies? How can it not be, as even the AHC is relying on privatized health care to run and administer the plans for the federal govt?
This was to lower cost will not or has not done such, the deductible amounts since the inception of AHC have gone up.not even stayed close to the same. Some companies are either going to pay higher premiums for those they cover or have to lessen the quality of care for all they cover because cost control simply is not there.
Many will go to the AHC minimum requirements and nothing more, I FEEL this was designed that way to get everyone except congress and the president on the same care plan across the board. This will happen I have little doubt.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 24, 2015 15:38:57 GMT -6
No buying Bryce those are the facts the people that work with me and for me had to sign a waiver to decline coverage in order to get more hours! this is fact. They thought is was dumb because they get great benefits from their employers who they retired from so did not need our benefits nor want them.
yet it is against the law to bring up a waiver from the employer so if your smart enough to figure it out and ask for such waiver then you can do more than the 28. it goes of course by number of employees but the 28 hr rule is the new law.
To me that is counter productive no other words to describe such............
In fact it also guarantees more people are or will be on the AHC because of such rule!
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 24, 2015 5:22:44 GMT -6
Pam the key of any successful president is to get both sides to work together on some key issues and not add to the division this president has done the latter.
Easy to say all republicans fault or all democrats depending on who has control, yet the main goal of a good president is to bring together both sides and move the agenda forward. Being a great mediator would go far as president of the U.S. as it seems common place for Both sides to dig in their heels.
Bryce we do know that AHC has and will continue to limit FT jobs now and in the future, that is a fact unless some things get changed. We are replacing lots of lost jobs with PT employment and adding to the ACH by the regulations put in place. Where I work we have a few retired people they have been told their is a magic number now of hours in a year so they cannot hit the 28 avg as they do not want to have to pay for benefits for PT help. Not in the budget.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 23, 2015 15:19:35 GMT -6
Bryce 8 years ago, yes 8 years ago what has happened since Obama has taken office to change much?
Many executive orders in place, AHCA which has not gone as promised and grid lock amongst congress.
Obama as we know now is not and was not what we needed for a president in such times, he has been for the most part ineffective as a leader and knows little about economics that we all know today.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 23, 2015 5:08:31 GMT -6
As far as the state of the Union well I see little REAL difference, yet history will break down Obama effectivness as a 2 term president..........
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 23, 2015 5:06:58 GMT -6
Tman new report just came out pre AHCA avg Deductable around 300 now post AHCA just over 1000 for out of pocket Deductable. this was suppose to make health care cheaper for the majority.
We went from many jobs that would be FT into many,many more that hold that magical number of less than 28 hrs per week. That way employers do not have to offer health care.
So while yes it has provided some more opportunity overall I think not so great as written, we have more cost, higher deductibles and employers keeping people below the 28 hr weekly avg. which does little except add more cost to all tax payers!
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Sept 23, 2015 5:00:47 GMT -6
Nice like the character of that rack
|
|