|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 21, 2016 6:54:53 GMT -6
Funny many disagree with you .
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 21, 2016 5:37:28 GMT -6
Jim if you have the proof to,show such, bring it fourth and we can discuss it as well.
This stuff goes above and beyond running a campaign and some negative ads.
Very calculated and to the point of having media involved heavily for one candidate over another, inciting riots, a group taking money from many Foriegn countries that have terrorist links , treats woman badly and is not looking out for Americans best interest, having a primary where the majority involved from the national committee is pre destined to ruin one persons chances early on.
Again these things add up to paint a very clear and real picture of polotics in the US today.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 21, 2016 5:27:43 GMT -6
Musher that stuff will not matter and the democrats will bring it up for,the next 3 election cycles the time when Trump tried to get the election thrown his way by using the court system LOL.
When stuff goes down hill, they will blame trumps court proceedings as the reason why things in America have not gotten any better.
To be honest if Trump looses , he needs to go,back to running his business and that will be that, I just hope politicians wake up and see why Trump was elected during the primary in the first place. We can never forget people put him there for s reason, and they still imight vote him POTUS time will tell.
Either way lessons to,be learned from this election cycle for sure for all the DC politicians.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 20, 2016 20:24:07 GMT -6
Her assertion as to what exactly?
While I agree trump could have handled some of those questions far better, the wiki leaks has shown this election is rigged to a degree, from CNN and now DNC head feeding questions , to starting riots at trumps rallies, to the attacks on Bernie sanders , to making fun of Catholics, to firing of their DNC head who then went to Hillarys campaign in lighting fast progression, even after she had to step down, to Martha from ABC getting in a debate with a presidential candidate, to the main stream telling people wiki leaks are illegal to view and trust us to give you the proper interpretation, to private dinners for reporters durring an election cycle, etc,etc.
I mean any human being who had to see all that happening could think nothing else, be it a board member running to a govneror to a presidential candidate.
Common sense does go along ways, even if you see trump as a whining baby in your mind. He has a right to think such with all the evidence put in front of him and the American people.
You do not agree with anything I presented to the reasons as to why he thinks it is rigged?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 20, 2016 18:53:53 GMT -6
: a system of rules that explain the correct conduct and procedures to be followed in formal situations : a plan for a scientific experiment or for medical treatment
I agree enough is enough.
The protocol is as defined and they change with the groups setting them up. The definitions are as used in any trapping BMP.
The groups did not want to narrow the testing of any device down to a singular method, that is not what normal trappers do in any situation even coon trapping. That is a fact.
Those traps that passed the COON BMP will work across a variety of terrain, upland or water and reduce chewing that is fact , they also surpassed the efficiency standards set fourth As well or would have not passed either.
Good day.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 20, 2016 18:06:52 GMT -6
Trump maybe a lot of things and some true and some not, just as for Hillary but trump has never been in politics and as far as we know he has never pulled what the Clinton aching and the clintons have pulled. We can thank wiki leaks for brining this kind of corruption out to the public in mass. I will not,say it is just Hillary plenty of other corrupt people, but shows the inside actions of her, and her poeple,and her husband.
She side stepped every wiki leaks topic brought up by Wallace as she only have 2 options lie once again or face the truth.
There will be more by Election Day we know that , we also know trump has a woman issue , the other stuff is just fodder nothing ore or less.
Trump,is not the only business man to file bankruptcy, pay less or no taxes he was honest in that subject time and time again. You can keep bashing on the taxes issue, but hold him accountable along with all other politicians who have done the same or never paid their taxes when due for a good period of years.
What the wiki leaks show is pure lack of regard for anything or anyone but themselves. The video tape is showing us all how the DNC operates and we have the man on the video tape laughing about starting riots in Chicago and paying people to do so. This was something planned out and calculated and is not only dangerous to by standers but also a dangerous way to try and win an election.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 20, 2016 6:03:06 GMT -6
The other odd thing was both where told their plans would add massive amounts to the debt and yet neither one where willing to concede to that?
We have trickle down and middle out a new age term Clinton seems to like, I will take trickle down with less taxes than middle out and taxing those who create jobs any day on that gamble. She talks about taxing business more and more, we never tax business as those are owned by people who pay the taxes a building never pays taxes and it does not effect it, but it sure does effect people.
So my prediction is she wins, the job sector suffers, debt rises, entitlements go higher even after the talk about not being able to fund it going forward, she makes run at the 2nd amendment, gun sales go insane and another major stock of up of ammo and reloading supplies takes place and our military shrinks as she will rob from it to pay for more entitlement programs like free college which will not help the country one bit, as jobs will not be comming back under her in any numbers what so ever.
I look forward to states using their muscle more under her, congress in more grid lock and the democrats blaming the republicans for all that goes wrong durring the next 4 years, as she still blames Bush for Obama's in effectivness as president.
I was just happy to see her finally brought out into the light as dishonest and corrupt that debate proved that without a doubt!
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 20, 2016 5:48:01 GMT -6
Yes James trump did what you said as well as Hillary going on past when Wallace was trying to break in as well.
What we learned from the debates last night is wiki leaks played a major role, each and every question asked concerning information from it , she dodged like the plague. She never answered any of it directly and never denounced any of it either. The tapes brought up about the DNC ensighitng riots in Chicago was big pints for trump, she had nothing to say not one word on the matter. Not good for her and some poeple on the fence.
While I think trump could have done better, I feel his New Yorker attitude is what cost him a lot of times.
The entire pay to play which is 100 percent correct thanks to wiki leaks, she went on by and talked about the great work the foundation does, total dodge! I also likes that trump came back with give the money back from those countries that have donated that suppress woman and others bad beliefs they have. Again she had nothing to say. Hati issue another she just had no answer for as well.
you confront her with the truth she has nothing and dodges around with pre made up responses. She is a perfect politician.
I also thought trump did well in the talks on The Middle East as well. Again he comes off brash I Think his down fall was his NY attitude.
Also trumps not willing to commit to the election when it ends. Not good for him in that regard either.
What I wanted to see took place , it showed her and Bil as corrupt that was the main driving point and it came how loud and clear to many people.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 19, 2016 17:24:50 GMT -6
We shall see? I know being rude is the worst in politics LMAO.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 19, 2016 5:47:41 GMT -6
With all that has broke in the last 4-5 days should get real,interesting tonight at the debate!
Can't wait to see what questions come up and how they both handle them!
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 18, 2016 18:05:03 GMT -6
The protocol is set up to do exactly what you think is crap. Test the trap on various measures, animal selectivity, damage to said animal, catch rate, animal welfare etc.
It is all,on the BMP area of AFWA website.
So why did you not partake in the coon or coyote BMP's?
Again 20 years and going and all trappers benefit from such.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 18, 2016 17:59:58 GMT -6
Tman what percentage are the 3-5 coyote spots versus the 10-15 coyote spots?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 17, 2016 19:45:26 GMT -6
Tman do you have any spots that yield 10-15 coyotes or more each year?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 17, 2016 18:10:53 GMT -6
Everything you disagree with is crap LOL.
Where were you when the testing was being done? Did you offer your services to test traps? I think You really have little knowledge on the entire BMP process and what it took to get this all under way and appease all groups involved.
No one group was going to walk away with all they wanted no way no how, or this would have fell apart and the EU ban would have done in the wild fur market to a very large degree. You talk right on past that.
I get it you do not like the coon BMP therefore it is crap, the mission statement is crap, you sound like the FTA LOL.
Yet the entire process has helped trappers, trapping and kept our fur markets open to around the world. Can't be too crappy LOL.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 16, 2016 18:44:30 GMT -6
The protocol is to test the trap period.
Nope never seen a coon in my life. If water is minor then why do you want to test them being held in water? I think you need to re read the mission statement of the entire trapping BMP process. It is on the AFWA website. It clearly defines all your looking for.
We are sitting her arguing over something that will never see the light of day. I will end by stating see above mentioned................
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 16, 2016 7:46:19 GMT -6
Ok Tman tell us your in the water method. Then we can debate if it is the trap keeping the score low or the method you use? It really is that simple.
Again this post was started out to point out facts, that the BMP's have not become law in any state, that they have made it 20 years and counting, that they have kept fur markets open for all North American trappers, and that AFWA has done a great job at promoting trapping with the studies and PR material available, these are all facts.
I for one am glad that trappers for a change received some funding to promote us! That is a great thing.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 15, 2016 20:57:20 GMT -6
No the trap,would not be tested because you are isolating the trap!
The only way it gets a passing score is by providing no opportunity for thr coon to chew. Not the trap at all, 100 percent method related. Be like staying ai can get a 3 Bridger to pass if I rig the trap on a spring thst elevates the coon off the ground as he hangs, that is not testing the trap either , that is isolating the coon from being able to chew that is a method and the trap means nothing at that point.
The design of the trap DP's which allow the coon not to chew by the design of the trap, doesn't matter if in water or land the coon cannot get to its foot by deisgn of the tool, methods be damned. That is 100 percent the trap that keeps the coon from chewing. Same as a double jaw will,have an effect on chewing as well. Doesn't matter where you set it the trap design effects and limits chewing which we know coons will do if allowed.
Your variable is clearly evident and the only way it passes is by selective setting technique, which has nothing to do with the trap, no other trap was tested as such.
The isolation comes from the coons inability to get to its foot, that can happen one of 2 ways the tool design itself or the methods used to keep him from getting to the foot.
One fits the criteria for BMP trap testing the other does not get close to the protocols set fourth.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 15, 2016 11:03:22 GMT -6
You mean as number of traps per location?
Yes if that is your question .
Thise traps need to be set in the areas where your getting maximum visitation, a travel way will net a couple coyotes, the key areas will bring in far more than 3-5 coyotes.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 15, 2016 6:33:31 GMT -6
So picture 4 what is making that a stall out spot? What are we not seeing there? Rolling hill looks to be along side some standing corn?
Picture one tractor lane between fresh plowed fields what are we not seeing that makes that the stallout location or what is in that area of plowed ground they all want to come and see? Or is this trail leading to a dead pile? If so how far away is such pile?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Oct 15, 2016 6:24:42 GMT -6
Ok coyote picture 1 and 4 what do you have in these areas to draw them ? Also the one with the skull I think it is? What is the main attractant there as well?
|
|