|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 8, 2016 6:25:53 GMT -6
Easy for me to say I am going to tax the crap,out of people and here is where I want to spend the money. That is not running a country that is running an Indian reservation. Socialism at its worst.
|
|
|
Post by PamIsMe on Mar 8, 2016 12:25:10 GMT -6
"...committed crimes by the numbers of emails she had on a private unsecured phone of top secret information." That is absolutely just not true except in the minds of conservative republicans who will say or do anything to try to make her look bad during the campaign. reverbpress.com/justice/what-the-fbi-found-in-hillarys-email-server-will-really-piss-republicans-off/ As for campaign contributions by Wall Street and Drug companies, start googling. The repub candidates also take money from them. Maybe not from Trump who says he's funding his own campaign but as it turns out he "lent" his campaign $17 million to be paid back out of campaign funds raised from donors. Politics as usual.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 8, 2016 16:08:27 GMT -6
Pam again agree with most, but Hillary did break the law as she had top secret information in a private phone, if you or I did such we would be in jail already. Fact. I like to you use as non biased as possible this really tells us something, which by the way I do not want someone like this in charge of our country. Also if is would have been a republican the left would be looking to hang them up pronto again Fact! www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/mar/12/hillary-clintons-email-did-she-follow-all-rules/Your source holds little to many as it is a left biased website easy enough to tell.
|
|
|
Post by bblwi on Mar 8, 2016 16:14:42 GMT -6
You totally don't understand the profession of politics as you rarely if ever can to one thing 1,000 times. The nature of politics and almost any corporate level management or administration is that you most times have to make quick decisions with limited time and knowledge, so a persons life experiences, knowledge and insights are critically important. What you are advocating is a widget worker and we don't need that in our leadership. The employers I have consulted and helped train and find management people were not looking for the skill set you related there. You are advocating the skill sets of a minimal wage type employee yet you won't advance there pay when they become skilled. My choices in leadership be they conservative, Centrist or progressive would not be people who do one thing well or even want to do one thing 1,000 times.
Bryce
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on Mar 8, 2016 16:15:30 GMT -6
how can anyone be so negative on another parties candidate, when he is too afraid to name who he supports?
manup- name your candidate!
|
|
|
Post by PamIsMe on Mar 9, 2016 0:51:43 GMT -6
TC, no matter what source you like, they all say the same thing. Your source said:
In Clinton’s defense, we should note that it was only after Clinton left the State Department, that the National Archives issued a recommendation that government employees should avoid conducting official business on personal emails (though they noted there might be extenuating circumstances such as an emergency that require it). Additionally, in 2014, President Barack Obama signed changes to the Federal Records Act that explicitly said federal officials can only use personal email addresses if they also copy or send the emails to their official account.
Because these rules weren’t in effect when Clinton was in office, "she was in compliance with the laws and regulations at the time," said Gary Bass, founder and former director of OMB Watch, a government accountability organization.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 9, 2016 16:46:59 GMT -6
Pam some how I knew you would pull the only positive from the entire story LOL. The Liberial left got to love them, Bill said he never had sexual relations with that woman good enough for me....................
Hillary is a liar at best.
But at least my source was about as non biased as you could find on the subject, they do say she has not been totally honest, the only other way to say that is LIAR.
Tman I can be so against Bernie because his ideas and thoughts would be very detrimental to our country no joke all fact.
I can be so against Hilary because we will have more of the same, again which would be bad for our country.
Too,afraid nope, just keeping the post on topic is all.
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on Mar 10, 2016 14:58:13 GMT -6
you should be a politician- what a long winded, scattered answer and still-
not enough convictions to name who you support-
prove you have convictions- who do you put YOUR $$$ behind?
I'm starting to wonder if you even vote
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 10, 2016 17:09:48 GMT -6
Bryce sure you can one uses the background to make informed decisions, in fact many things relate. I was a city council member and president of such, I used much of my background to make decisions, I also relied on great sources like finance officer, city attorney and others. That is why a diverse makeup is important and I will take a business man or woman next to me versus someone who just looks to,push a personnel agenda any day.
The problem with our federal govt is they run nothing like a city council or a county commission, they are too far removed from the people in many cases. The first thought should be every day, we are Intrusted with the tax payers money, let us use it wisely and to not infringe on the freedoms of the people that fits at any level of govt. but hard for many to remember.
I was on the council with a few people easy to spot those with an ax to grind or agenda to push, they never got really far as we had other members who could see it and that is not what we where their to do. Listen to the people, not enact our personnel thoughts or ideas onto others.
I am geared I guess different than some, when I do something it is with 110 percent commitment, I want to know everything possible about the topic or task and I seek out as much information as possible and listen a lot to those with the knowledge on the subject, then I apply such and see what is real and what is fluff. Then I do it again,and again and again. To see what changes and what stays the same. The best way "I" know to be informed and become an expert on or at something.
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 10, 2016 21:08:54 GMT -6
Tman says I should be in politics and then Bryce tells me I have no clue on the "profession" of politics? I am so confused?
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on Mar 11, 2016 7:33:06 GMT -6
its not an oxymoron-
you should be a politician, because you always refuse to answer the question, instead pulling something out of right field and try to divert the question to something not even close to what was asked.
for example- who do you support?
on the other hand, you DON'T have a clue about politics- and that is evident in that you ignore facts & science-
|
|
|
Post by bblwi on Mar 11, 2016 13:41:42 GMT -6
You totally did not understand my post, background and thinking ability IS CRITICALLY important in professional positions, all really, and even more so when you don't have repetition 1,000 times to base a decision on. Your example was the example of 25 years of working with 1 year of experience and 24 years of doing the same thing. I find your input not reliable as you were the one stating the GOP is not talking about changing SSI etc. You evidently don't read the news or listen to the discussion of those like Cruz, Trump and Rubio who are the next hoped for champions of the GOP.
Bryce
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 11, 2016 18:42:38 GMT -6
Tman what public office have you ran for in your life? what have you won?
Facts and science ok. Your facts don't match my facts and your science doesn't match my science so around we go.
Cruz and rubio changing SSI to make it sustainable. Trump wants to leave it alone if possible. It will not effect you or Gappa so no worries, it will effect younger people, personally I will take Cruz on that issue allow my money to go into a 401 K that I run and control, my return on investment will be far better than what the federal govt has an is giving out now FACT. Plus they will not be able to use my or anyone else 401K to use for another special interest program.
Bryce you get background information form doing such, not just putting in the time somewhere telling people you think you know. When I was in college I had some plant prop course and turf grass courses as well, yeh they went ok , it wasn't until I was in the field every day that things started to make lots of sense and where I truly got my education on turf grass , same with Woody ornamentals and classes, I received an arborist license and when I started in the field and saw various diseases,insects and nutrient needs and how and what to use for a period of time did I become an expert in these fields.
Now READ real carefully, people like Obama and Sanders have little REAL knowledge on business and other facets of becoming a great president. I fully understand critical thinking but thanks anyhow.
|
|
|
Post by bblwi on Mar 11, 2016 20:31:54 GMT -6
You get your background information from high levels of repetition, I do not. I two served in leadership capacities on school board 10 years and statewide organizations with up to and over 2,000 members etc. I sure did not get my leadership awards by running meetings or making decisions on new items by having done them 1,000 times before. I did that by doing many things and remembering and learning from each one. So you want a president of the US to come to a state of the union address with the same speech for 4 years because repetition is better than spreading yourself too thin?
Bryce
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on Mar 12, 2016 9:42:53 GMT -6
now the question is am I a politician? lol
I do have a degree in political science, with a concentrate in constitutional law and minors in international law & American history.
I did run for one office- our local school board- I lost, but point to pride in one township I won 100% , all 89 of the votes.
good post Bryce
still avoiding the question TC- name a name for Gods sake- man up!
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 13, 2016 6:19:16 GMT -6
My cousin has a degree in poly science as well, never really used it either. He makes far more doing IT stuff and has his own adventure blog and travels the world. You should have kept at it Tman that is running for public office. I found it to be rewarding. I sat on a school board and also a city council. That is right people actually voted for me on several,occasions LOL.
Bryce I will give you the point your are very literal. The point being doing things once or a handful of times is far different than doing different skills 100's of times.
I could give you examples but why bother..............
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on Mar 13, 2016 10:30:39 GMT -6
coyote control= pure socialism
but TC is in denial.
again- be a brave little soldier and say who you support- otherwise, your commentary is meaningless
|
|
|
Post by bblwi on Mar 13, 2016 14:29:58 GMT -6
Please don't bother the redundancy would be lengthy as it has to be 1,000 times in your mind. You have the mindset of the repetitive work place that the world is moving away from. The industrial revolution started about 275 years ago and it has morphed significantly and your work model shows you still want to be live in that past. Carpenters use pneumatic hammers so they have time to do more creative things and get more done and not spend days and days pounding nails.
Bryce
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 13, 2016 20:02:00 GMT -6
Bryce you still have to use that nailer a lot or your productivity is going to be lower correct? A guy using one for 5 years versus a newbie who is going to frame faster or shingle faster with such a tool? Hard for the guy with the nail gun experience to preach to those with lots of experience how they are doing it wrong correct?
Tman coyote control is a joint effort between those receiving services and those paying I some in a form of taxation, sadly many other federal programs with those using the services MOST are not or will not be paying much of anything into them.
In most states where coyote control take place those receiving services pay into the program. Varies as to how much state to state some a lot more than others but they all pay into coyote control. Wyoming has a state wide 1.00 head tax on sheep and cattle, if you have a guy with 6,000 ewes he lays in 6,000 per year for services, a guy with 300 cattle he pays in 300 per year etc.
South Dakota has a head tax, some predator boards tax themselves again for even more revenue to protect them, the benefit is not only to producers but wildlife as well, so a small percentage of sur tax on license sales goes into the ADC program as well, and then the counties pay a small percentage and GFP does a 2-1 match remember the SD GFO receives ZERO general fund dollars, also some Pittman money gets used as well in states for predator control as well.
So to answer your question no rancher or producer who has livestock is getting a free ride for predator control. Yes I know your going to state the same on other programs we could break down the percentage of benefits to cost ratio for them if you like? Don't forget to factor in the earned income credit which from the IRS website equates to 27.5 million people received 66.7 billion in EIC. Tax year 2014 from the IRS website.
In comparison wildlife services has a budget of 100 million for all of it programs that fall under their guidance. In which many pay into the program. So what has a bigger impact? That is for each to decided but 100 million versus 66 billion you would agree is far different? Correct? I could fish out the number ranchers pay into the ADC programs for the western US if you would like?
|
|
|
Post by trappincoyotes39 on Mar 13, 2016 20:05:10 GMT -6
I am for some programs and think some could use cutting to just be efficient as possible, that is the best case scenario making sure each program has merit and runs as efficient as it possibly can and cut waste where ever possible. I have always said I must use the money provided to me working for any govt agency in a manner the tax payers would be proud of. Simple concept really.
I will make it clear that I am not for more socialist programs for the sake of such what so ever and what Berine wants is more programs with less accountability and will hurt avg Americans more than help them and hurt our country as a whole, again look at the numbers by the tax foundation on Bernies plans and how it takes away from our GDP and cuts jobs not adds them. Not rocket science by any means.
|
|