|
|
Post by trappnman on May 18, 2004 17:24:39 GMT -6
Let me guess- #11 were traps created by the God's......
|
|
|
|
Post by trappnman on May 19, 2004 7:14:37 GMT -6
What exactly is the point of testing traps that will, in all practicality, be used 99.999999999% in drowning sets.
If a freaking stoploss tests well- then there is no reason in the world a #1 shouldn't test the same- assuming both were leg drowning sets.
Or are drowning sets concidered verbaten here also?
|
|
|
|
Post by foxtail on May 22, 2004 20:35:47 GMT -6
OK, so we test for muskrats, using methods that no real trappers are likely to use.
Then we write about how most of the muskrats had terrible damage done to them.
Is George Orwell in charge of this program?
|
|
|
|
Post by Maineman on May 25, 2004 22:04:10 GMT -6
MChewk, thanks for keeping us up to date...IMHO, just about any trap on a properly constructed drowning set will acomplish the same result in about the same amount of time...
|
|
|
|
Post by CoonDuke on May 27, 2004 12:28:44 GMT -6
I wonder if the stoploss tested was the OUT OF PRODUCTION Woodstream Victor???
|
|
