|
Post by trappnman on Jan 26, 2016 10:39:55 GMT -6
just starting to look at the numbers-
overall on my line, I took 19% YOY males, 38% adult males, 32% yoy females and 11% adult females.
so 51% yoy, and 49% adults
this is somewhat skewed because determination was based on size, teeth, condition and when in doubt ease in skinning.
I do know from our collaring project that we over estimated adults overall-
and this data could well be skewed in calling some yoy males, adults-
and some adult females labeled as yoy
based on extra large pups could well be shown as adults, and the opposite with females- smaller adult females could be classified as adults
any thoughts on this?
hard
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 11:16:19 GMT -6
I didn't keep a record but I had WAY more YOY females then everything else combined. 2X older males then older females compared to some years where they were pretty darn even. I wasn't surprised at the number of YOY females IF studies are correct about repopulating after a severe reduction in population. I'd say my population is just about back to a normalcy after 3 years of mange along with 1 year of Parvo thrown in for good measure!
I still have concerns about the mange thing. I had several properties this year that are great producers that I didn't find enough sign to set on. Every single property owner(and crew) is a big-time deer hunter and all camera-upped, reported to me that they never recorded a single coyote which is completely wrong as compared to normal falls.
|
|