Rod17
Demoman...
Posts: 229
|
Post by Rod17 on Nov 28, 2006 21:34:37 GMT -6
I believe several folks have said the use the PIT set-up. Has anyone used the Sterling paws-i-trip? If so, what's the difference between it and the others? how does the performance compare?
|
|
|
Post by trptyler on Nov 29, 2006 0:16:36 GMT -6
I wasn't that impressed. Just file shorten the pan notch, nitelatch it, square and smooth all your edges(needed on all traps, anyway) and save three bucks or so in the process. I thought they were"touchy" to tune, myself. I can tune a regular pan/dog setup in one fourth of the time I can get a positrip type pan tuned. Just my humble .02 worth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2006 5:50:15 GMT -6
I use them and like them a lot. They are the same thing, there's no difference, same principals involved, and were invented by the same guy.
|
|
|
Post by Jeffrey on Nov 29, 2006 6:51:13 GMT -6
I don't know which ones I put on some Victor #3 dls and I liked the way they turned out. I didn't have to worry about non targets in my traps during early coyote season.
|
|
|
Post by ohiyotee on Nov 29, 2006 7:23:11 GMT -6
I use #3 double longs on coyotes and they all have paws i trip on them. I went from catching rabbits,crows, small possums, etc to nill the next year. best thing i ever did. totally eliminates pan travel , wobble , and is tension adjustable. I have bl and victors , prefer the bl stronger springs. Got mine from Paul dobbins years ago and he made me a good deal on the bulk i got 8 dozen so he was flexible. I might add that i think that they should be center swiveled , base plated, offset , laminated, 3 swivels and you have an indestructible trap. greg
|
|
Rod17
Demoman...
Posts: 229
|
Post by Rod17 on Nov 29, 2006 20:00:58 GMT -6
thanks for the feedback guys.
|
|