|
|
Post by CoonDuke on Jun 3, 2009 13:12:26 GMT -6
Anybody have any? Good or bad?
|
|
|
|
Post by Freak( Jim V.) on Jun 3, 2009 15:08:25 GMT -6
They do the job Ok. Think I still have one or 2 flaoting around. Will get less morning and evening than higherpriced copes for sure though. ButHeck your spending about half so guess it works out???
|
|
|
|
Post by coyotetrapper28 on Jun 3, 2009 16:12:52 GMT -6
Save your money and buy a good scope, you will be glad you did.
|
|
|
|
Post by stickbowhntr on Jun 3, 2009 18:00:46 GMT -6
you may be right but they keep upping those good jobs overseas and upping the price I have to pay so the cheap labor can do them [thus bigger profit fo CO's] and I am making less everyday so how can I save ANY money ..IF I do it goes away anyway, SO get what you can afford now and need for your weapon enjoy it while you can and just remember price drives many decessions.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoonDuke on Jun 3, 2009 19:05:47 GMT -6
I guess I should have added...I want to put it on a .22 rimfire. Most of my centerfires wear a Leupold but I don't want to spend that much for a 22.
I am debating between Swift or Mueller.
|
|
|
|
Post by stickbowhntr on Jun 3, 2009 19:58:47 GMT -6
I have a Bushnell 3-9x 32mm AO airgun scope on one of my 22's love it, less than $100
|
|
|
|
Post by lb on Jun 3, 2009 22:47:58 GMT -6
I'm not really a scope snob, but can't pay money on inferior gear. If price were a serious consideration, I'd look at quality used scopes, fixed power. I have a Browning 22 that has a very old Redfield 4X on it, probably 40 years old? The scope came mounted on a rifle I bought and figured to throw it away but it's really a good one, more than suitable for a rimfire and far superior to the second tier stuff assembled offshore, and that probaly costs more, yet lacks durability and fogproof? Maybe Swift doesn't make a fixed power, I don't know? Even an old steel 4X Weaver would be an option, but a new fixed X Leupold is quite reasonable. I just don't think the japs make a decent rugged scope. Good glass, for the most part, but I'm just not a fan. Can you tell?
|
|
|
|
Post by ltpete on Jun 17, 2009 6:24:07 GMT -6
Swift is a good scope for the money. I have on and dropped it one time hard and never had to make any adjustments.
|
|
|
|
Post by calvin on Sept 6, 2009 20:16:57 GMT -6
Swift scopes are not inferior scopes. However if a .22 is your goal, take a look at the Bushnell "sportview". a Very nice, fairly inexpensive .22 scope with large objectives and adjustability.
|
|
